Jonathan Djanogly being paid nearly £1000 an hour by a firm benefiting from NHS Covid contracts


Huntingdon’s MP, Jonathan Djanogly, has joined the ranks of Tory MPs facing serious criticism for doing highly-paid work in addition to their role as a constituency MP.

For this to be possible points to a political system that is badly broken.

After the resignation of Owen Patterson for “serious breaches” of parliamentary standards around his consulting work, criticisms of Geoffrey Cox (who’s reportedly earning £1 million a year for legal work and been criticised for representing the British Virgin Islands in a corruption case from what appears to be his Commons office) and records of more than 90 Tory MPs having significant earnings from other work, there’s clearly a big issue of #TorySleaze.

According to the Daily Mail, Djanogly has been paid “£30,000 for just 32 hours’ work a year by a firm that has benefited from NHS Covid contracts”.

This is shocking, especially at a time when many people are struggling financially because of Covid.

Djanogly’s controversial role is as chair of Pembroke Venture Capital Trust which has a stake in Thriva, a company which has picked up Government contracts reportedly worth £186million. Thriva’s accounts show it was worth £922,000 at the end of 2019 and it was reportedly worth £30million in the summer of 2021.

The same article says that Djanogly “defended his lucrative second job and insisted he had not made any personal approaches to ministers on behalf of Thriva”. But the sudden mushrooming of government work heading to Thriva makes me raise an eyebrow.

The problem with this is that, if MPs are earning substantial sums from extra work, who do they represent? The constituents who elect them? Their outside paymasters? Or the party that turns a blind eye?

The #TorySleaze crisis has removed the Tory lead in the polls: on the same weekend that the Djanogly story broke, the Tories were 6 points behind.

 


 

It gets worse...

Negative coverage of Djanogly continued in The Guardian, 18 November, which reminded readers a story from 2011 when he was "stripped of his responsibility to regulate firms that 'ambulance chase' the public following a Guardian investigation that revealed how he and his family could profit from controversial changes to legal aid he was piloting in parliament."


Share this post on social media:

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or Email.